More applications out. Every one written for the job.
A tailored resume works, and costs an evening. The same one sent everywhere is fast, and gets ignored. SwiftFit is both — all you do is check, proofread and send.
- 1
Check
Shortlist the jobs you want, from a list curated for you.
Matched to your profile
- 9191 out of 100, above the cut-off of 65, fire-assayed against your profile
Staff Data Engineer, Platform
Verrill Grid
- 8484 out of 100, above the cut-off of 65, fire-assayed against your profile
Senior Data Engineer
Halden Systems
Cut-off 65 - 6464 out of 100, below the cut-off of 65, fire-assayed against your profile
Analytics Engineer
Motte & Co.
- 2
Proofread
Proofread the resume already tailored to that job.
Written for one posting
Owned the nightly ingestion path from production Postgres into the warehouse.
- 3
Track
Every job you apply to, in one place.
One register, every job
- Interested
- Tailored
- Applied
- Interview
- Offer
Staff Data Engineer, Platform
AppliedSenior Data Engineer
Tailored
Illustrative: authored for this page.
You have been picking one or the other.
Both work. Each costs you the thing the other one gives.
Generic, at scale
One resume, fifty times. Minutes each.
Cheap, and mostly ignored.
Tailored, by hand
Three applications. Two hours each.
Every evening you had.
SwiftFit
Thousands read. The few worth it, written.
And your evenings back.
You see the jobs worth your time, read the resume already written for the one you pick, and apply. The same application, tailored, at the speed of sending it raw.
Graded against what you want. Not what you last did.
Four elements, scored separately. The weakest one explains the verdict.
Staff-level data platform work. Ownership of a pipeline end to end. No on-call rotation.
Toronto, ON · Remote (Canada)
Staff Data Engineer, Platform · Verrill Grid
- Work
- 9/10
- Industry
- 8/10
- Level
- 9/10
- Day to day
- 7/10
Pipelines and warehouse modelling. Energy data, like your last two roles. Staff, with a scope statement. On-call you did not ask for.
91
Above the cut-off of 65.
Apply
Day to day, at 7.
You binned three like this. On-call, every time.
Nothing is filtered until you say so.
Then it writes the one you send.
Rewritten for that posting, from your own resume. Never invented.
Owned the nightly ingestion path from production Postgres into the warehouse, the ETL and the dimensional models on top of it.
The marked line, before and after
Built and maintained ETL pipelines for the analytics team, moving data from production Postgres into the warehouse nightly.
Owned the nightly ingestion path from production Postgres into the warehouse, the ETL and the dimensional models on top of it.
Same job, same dates, same numbers — written to answer this posting.
- Length
- One page or two, your choice
- Download
- PDF or Word
- Evidence
- Nothing you did not do
And rather more than three steps.
All of it already built. None of it worth a screen of its own.
Finding
- Ranked against the role you described, not your last job title
- The ones that get through are read in full, not keyword-matched
- A pay floor, remote or on-site, contract or permanent
- Nothing older than a date you set
- New arrivals marked since the last time you looked
- Say no to one, and it works out why — then asks
Writing
- Rewritten from your own history, never invented
- One page or two, and it makes it fit
- A PDF that matches what you saw in the editor
- A Word file for the forms that insist on one
- Every line editable by hand, saved as you type
- Starts from the PDF resume you already have
Tracking
- Six stages, from saved through to an offer
- What has gone quiet, and for how long
- Every application on one register
Free, no account
- The resume editor itself
- A check on every bullet you have written
- Your resume read against a job description
- A PDF turned back into fields you can edit
Start with either.
Five steps to a ranked list. Or none at all to a better resume.
The resume you build in the editor comes with you if you sign up later.